Jump to Navigation
Subscribe to This Blog's Feed

Boca Raton Employment Law Blog

EEOC hears testimony on pregnancy discrimination issues

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission held a hearing Wednesday to hear testimony regarding pregnancy discrimination issues. The panel heard testimony of the recent ruling in Texas regarding a mother who was fired for seeking to bring a breast pump into work after her maternity leave.

Witnesses told the EEOC that even though the Pregnancy Discrimination Act has been around for more than three decades, workplace pregnancy discrimination is prevalent in the United States. One of the witnesses claims that a number of federal laws have overlapping points and says that the overlaps and gaps elsewhere between laws tends to create a number of gray areas.

Judge rules against fired mother who sought to use breast pump during breaks

A federal judge recently ruled in a workplace discrimination lawsuit that, "firing someone because of lactation or breast-pumping is not sex discrimination." The woman reportedly had asked her employer to provide a place for her to pump breast milk during breaks at work. The judge reportedly reasoned that lactation and pumping breast milk for a child are not pregnancy related issues, and therefore do not rise to the level of sex discrimination in the workplace.

The federal trial court judge is not chambered in Florida, and the trial court ruling is not binding on other courts. However, several federal trial court judges have previously issued similar rulings, and no higher level appellate courts have entertained the issue, which remains open for litigation.

National origin and race discrimination suit filed against Lee County

Lee County is facing a federal discrimination lawsuit that has been filed on behalf of three Hispanic workers. The workplace discrimination lawsuit is based upon claims of race discrimination and national origin discrimination in the workplace. An investigation launched several years ago to look into the allegations resulted in a 2009 report that stated that the discriminatory practices would support a claim for "hostile work environment" under the Civil Rights Act.

Nine employees were terminated in 2009 as a result of the probe, although one of the workers has reportedly been reinstated. The 2009 report says that several of the fired workers had banded together and called their group the "Ku Klux Klan without hats." Three Hispanic employees were reportedly subjected to discrimination in the workplace for roughly two years, leading to the probe of the hostile workplace.

Government to release discrimination report in Air Marshal probe

An investigation into the Air Marshal Service is making waves across the nation, and the results of the probe are not expected to be officially released until Thursday. The probe into allegations of discrimination and workplace retaliation erupted after a Jeopardy-like game board created by supervisors in the Orlando field office hit the public's eye some 21-months ago.

The Jeopardy-style game board was reportedly used by supervisors in the Air Marshal Service to make fun of workers who the supervisors did not like. The board included discriminatory categories based upon race, gender, national origin or ethnicity, and sexual orientation. The federal probe into the service suggests that federal investigators were unable to find any evidence that the offensive game board resulted in any unfair treatment of workers. The board was reportedly removed in 2009.

Retaliation Claims Top List of EEOC Complaints

As the first month of 2012 passes, it is important to look at 2011 totals compiled by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). According to a recent report, the EEOC received a record 99,947 charges of employment discrimination last year. The Commission obtained $455.6 million in monetary relief through its administrative program and litigation.

The most frequent charge was retaliation, with 37,334 charges filed, which made up 37.4 percent of the total charges in 2011. Federal law prohibits employers from taking action against employees for filing a charge of workplace discrimination or because they complained to their supervisor or other responsible entity about discrimination. Employers also may not fire, demote or otherwise discipline employees for taking part in employment discrimination investigations or lawsuits.

Court: Pregnant Florida woman eligible to sue under FMLA

A federal court of appeals recently issued an important ruling under the Family and Medical Leave Act. A Florida woman began a new job in October 2008, and in June 2009, she announced that she was pregnant. The woman sought protected FMLA leave to deal with childbirth, despite the fact that she had not yet reached her one year anniversary of employment with the Pompano Beach company. However, she was due to give birth in late November

The FMLA defines an "eligible employee" under the Act, as a worker who has been employed at the company for at least 12 months and has completed at least 1,250 hours of work for the company. The Pompano Beach employee requested FMLA leave during the summer months and says management began to denigrate her performance.

Fired compliance director sues Florida company for wrongful termination

A retired health care fraud investigator with the FBI was hired in 2006 by a Naples-based hospital chain to work in the medical company's compliance division. The hospital chain, Health Management Associates, reportedly fired the compliance officer in September. The former worker recently filed a lawsuit in Broward County against the Florida-based hospital company for wrongful termination. That case has been transferred to federal court in Fort Lauderdale.

The former worker says in his lawsuit that he was unlawfully fired in retaliation for uncovering alleged fraudulent Medicare billing within the hospital system. He says that he brought the issue to corporate management, but says that "no meaningful action had been taken to rectify the fraudulent billing practices ongoing within these facilities."

Federal appellate court finds for worker in same-sex harassment case

In 2010, a man filed a federal sexual harassment lawsuit against his former employer, alleging that he had been subjected to workplace harassment for six months in 2007 and the former employer did nothing to stop the harassment.

The case was a same-sex sexual harassment lawsuit and the worker and his supervisor are each married men. A federal appellate panel recently overturned the trial court's ruling. In overruling the trial court, the appellate decision says the worker did not have to prove that his harasser was gay to prevail in the same-sex sexual harassment lawsuit.

Company settles disability discrimination lawsuit over methadone

A national insurance company has agreed to settle a disability discrimination lawsuit that was filed on behalf of a recovering drug addict who was denied a job due to medications he was taking in his recovery. The man reportedly applied for a position as an insurance agent.

Apparently, things went well throughout the majority of the application project, as the man was offered a job with the insurance company, provided that the man passed a pre-employment drug screening test, according to the disability discrimination lawsuit.

The man had been recovering from his addiction and had been enrolled in a methadone treatment program since 2004. After the January 2010 pre-employment drug test showed the presence of methadone in the job applicant's system, he submitted a letter to the prospective employer explaining the program and the fact that the methadone was a legally prescribed medication. The company apparently reviewed the information and withdrew its offer of employment, according to the disability bias lawsuit.

Supreme Court rules against ministers, some questions unanswered, P. 2

In the last post, this blog began a discussion of a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling that makes an exception for churches in employment discrimination cases. A school teacher sued her former employer for disability discrimination for firing her after she became ill in 2004.

The woman sought to return from medical leave and was told she had been replaced by a substitute teacher. The woman had been diagnosed with Narcolepsy and sued the church-school under the Americans with Disabilities Act for her wrongful termination.

The federal trial court threw the woman's case out under a legal concept known as the "ministerial exception" to federal anti-discrimination laws. The lower court ruling is based upon the concept of separation of church and state, keeping the government out of church affairs.

Contact Us

Law Office of William M. Julien, P.A.

The Milan, Suite 550
1675 N. Military Trail
Boca Raton, Florida 33486

Telephone: 866-569-7398
Local: 561-995-9990
Fax: 561-995-8103

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close
Visit Our Employment Law Web Site Blog Topics Search
William Julien is a Proud Member of the Following Associations American Association for Justice NELA | National Employment Lawyers Association ABA | American Bar Association Palm Beach County Justice Association Broward County Justice Association Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum Million Dollar Advocates Forum